I believe my VCD302 project successfully met the criteria in creating an animation that showed my technical fluency in After Effects and my design aesthetic.
I am proud of my technical development, which includes (but is not limited to) learning how to animate text, incorporate and edit videos in After Effects, and creating seamless transition between sequences. By spending hours on YouTube following tutorials and experimenting on After Effects, this self-learning led to a deep technical understanding of kinetic type.
My aesthetic goal for this project was to make an animation that portrayed happy, surfy and peaceful vibes, as I believe these characteristics best encapsulate the northern suburbs of Wollongong. I achieved this through using bold typefaces and bright colours to accompany the videos.
My project also utilises primary and secondary motion to achieve its aesthetic purpose. Videos of the northern suburbs of Wollongong are used as the secondary motion, with the aim of making the animation engaging, captivating, and to visually correlate with the articles content. The videos are mostly still and peaceful snippets of nature, so it does not take away from the primary motion of kinetic type.
Although I believe my project meets the criteria, there were three key design decisions that altered my design process along the way. Ambrose and Harris in ‘Design Thinking’ suggest that throughout the design process, it is crucial to constantly take stock of where you are, where you are heading, what’s working and what’s not (Ambrose & Harris, 2009). Thus, these three key moments I have identified were recognition of components that were not working and needed to be fixed before moving further along in the project.
The first decision was to not incorporate extravagant kinetic type in every single sequence as I had initially proposed. There are two key reasons for this. The first was purely due to kinetic type being time consuming to learn then put into practice. I learnt that detailed kinetic type for each sequence would significantly set back my production timeline. The second reason was that I found if the more extraordinary kinetic type was used more sporadically in the animation, it was easier to watch and follow along.


The second significant design decision was based around the usage of videos. Up until a week before the project was due, I had decided to use solids instead of videos as the animations background, as I didn’t have enough footage to cover the entire video. However, I decided that by not having video as the primary background, it defeated the purpose of visually marketing the region. So, I visited different locations of the northern beaches of Wollongong to get more footage. Although time consuming, I’m glad I did this, as it helps the animation clearly retell the article visually. Solid backgrounds are still used occasionally to help break up the text.


The final design decision that was crucial to my animation was choosing colour and typefaces. Originally, I had my whole text in white with the same font. However, I decided that this was plain and boring. Changing the typeface and colour took much longer than what I anticipated as each video had different colours, so I had to match the typeface colour to what best suited the video. I believe the diverse typefaces and colours were key components in achieving my intended aesthetic outcome.
“The feedback generated at the end of the process becomes a learning opportunity for future projects” (Ambrose & Harris, 2009). The biggest feedback I would give to myself is to plan in more detail and spend more time storyboarding before designing. My style of editing reminds me of David Barringer who refers to himself as ‘the legislator and philosopher’ when it comes to editing. He changes his editing trajectory along the way of working, and while he sees this as liberating and empowering, the indecisiveness and lack of planning is equally painful (Lupton, 2011). He recognises that he must be discipline and constrain his editing and does so by first recognising the limits of his concept- something perhaps I should have considered before diving deep into a project that I knew little about (Lupton, 2011).
Overall, I am so glad I took a leap in the dark and investigated kinetic type for this project. I am excited to use kinetic type in the future within my field of design and marketing for the purposes of social media, marketing videos and design collateral.
References:
Ambrose, G, & Harris, P 2009, ‘Design Thinking’, AVA Publishing, accessed on the 3rd of June 2022.
Lupton, E 2011 ‘Graphic Design Thinking: Beyond Brainstorming’, Princeton Architectural Press, accessed on the 1st of June 2022.


















